Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make sure the first result in most recents is highlighted when user uses CMD+K #52298

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor

@nyomanjyotisa nyomanjyotisa commented Nov 11, 2024

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #51894
PROPOSAL: #51894 (comment)

Tests

Same as QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as QA Steps

QA Steps

  1. Navigate to search with CMD+K or click on the search icon (only on the Desktop web and Desktop app)
  2. Verify that the top-most result in Recent chats is highlighted
  3. Type in the search bar
  4. Verify that the chat query is highlighted
  5. Close the search bar
  6. Repeat steps 1-2
  7. Click on Enter
  8. Verify that the user navigated to the highlighted Recent chats
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android-Native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Android-mWeb.Chrome.mp4
iOS: Native
iOS-Native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
iOS-mWeb.Safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS-Chrome.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
MacOS-Desktop.mp4

@nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Pujan92 should we implement this on mobile native and mweb? or only on large screen(desktop and desktop web)?

Since the enter key hint displayed in the small screen width is "search". And on native mobile clicking search/enter key will always navigate to search page although the search input is empty, instead of navigating to the focused report

image

2024-11-11.at.10.40.47.mp4

@nyomanjyotisa nyomanjyotisa marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2024 14:29
@nyomanjyotisa nyomanjyotisa requested a review from a team as a code owner November 14, 2024 14:29
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from Pujan92 and removed request for a team November 14, 2024 14:29
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 14, 2024

@Pujan92 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@Pujan92
Copy link
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Nov 18, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screenshot_1732712461

Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native

Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 15 Pro - 2024-11-27 at 18 30 33

iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-11-27.at.18.27.43.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-11-27.at.18.36.32.mov

Comment on lines 337 to 342
useEffect(() => {
if ((!isWeb && !isDesktop) || textInputValue) {
return;
}
setInitialFocus();
}, [setInitialFocus, textInputValue, isWeb, isDesktop]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
useEffect(() => {
if ((!isWeb && !isDesktop) || textInputValue) {
return;
}
setInitialFocus();
}, [setInitialFocus, textInputValue, isWeb, isDesktop]);
useEffect(() => {
if ((!isWeb && !isDesktop)) {
return;
}
setInitialFocus();
}, [setInitialFocus, isWeb, isDesktop]);

Let search change focus be handled by onSearchChange function instead of making call to setInitialFocus twice.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah you are right, it calls the setInitialFocus twice

But this is intentional actually, if we dont early return when the textInputValue is not empty, it will trigger the setInitialFocus(); since setInitialFocus updated due to contextualReportData updated when we input search term

See this video
New-Expensify.35.mp4

I think we should remove setInitialFocus(); on onSearchChange instead

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As of now we need to focus only for the first time we can remove this entire function and use initiallyFocusedOptionKey as mentioned here. We won't consider of refocusing when the input is cleared by user.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nyomanjyotisa nyomanjyotisa Nov 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we use initiallyFocusedOptionKey, it will still focus on all platforms. Don’t we not need to focus on the mobile platform?

New-Expensify.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For that, we can use isLargeScreenWidth and set undefined initiallyFocusedOptionKey based on it.

const focusedItem = flattenedSections.allOptions.at(index);
if (focusedItem) {
onArrowFocus(focusedItem);
}
(shouldDebounceScrolling ? debouncedScrollToIndex : scrollToIndex)(index, true);
if (shouldScrollToIndex) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if (shouldScrollToIndex) {
if (shouldScrollToFocusedIndex) {
(shouldDebounceScrolling ? debouncedScrollToIndex : scrollToIndex)(index, true);
}

I think we don't need any changes in useArrowKeyFocusManager file.
How about adding state isInitialRender in SearchRouterList with default value false and toggle its value in onLayout of the SelectionList and pass it to SelectionList like below.

shouldScrollToFocusedIndex={!isInitialRender}

@Pujan92
Copy link
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Nov 19, 2024

@nyomanjyotisa I see that the data for different sections is available at different times. I suggest rendering the SelectionList once we fetch all data(sortedRecentSearches, recentReports) from whatever source.
So I propose the below changes, let me know your thoughts.

  1. Render SearchRouterList in SearchRouter component only after fetching all data(add a condition for it).

  2. In BaseSelectionList component, add a new prop shouldScrollToFocusedIndex with the default value true and use that to avoid scrolling in all places within that component.

  3. In SearchRouterList component,

  • Add state variable isInitialRender and update it to false in onLayout of SelectionList.
  • Use initiallyFocusedOptionKey as a consistent solution here
initiallyFocusedOptionKey={styledRecentReports.at(0)?.keyForList}
shouldScrollToFocusedIndex={!isInitialRender}

I believe this is more cleaner solution without modifying common component with more states for the initial focus and I think only for the initial render we should focus the item irrespective of textinput entered and gets cleared by the user.
Let me tag @luacmartins to review the raised PR and my thoughts in this comment.

Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a comment. I also agree with @Pujan92's comments

Comment on lines 61 to 62
const isWeb = getPlatform() === CONST.PLATFORM.WEB;
const isDesktop = getPlatform() === CONST.PLATFORM.DESKTOP;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Pujan92 should we create platform-specific files for this case?

@nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

So I propose the below changes, let me know your thoughts.

Seems good, will work on this today

@nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Pujan92 have done all your recommendations above, could you check again?

Also, should we create platform-specific files for this case?

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@nyomanjyotisa why is the conditional !isWeb && !isDesktop? Are we trying to exclude those platforms specifically or just large screen devices in general? Because if it's the latter, we should be using useResponsiveLayout to get the screen width instead and then there's no need to create platform specific files

@nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

nyomanjyotisa commented Nov 22, 2024

The ⁠isWeb and ⁠isDesktop checks ⁠ are used because this feature only implemented on Desktop Web and Desktop App platform

But yeah I think we should use ⁠isLargeScreenWidth from ⁠ useResponsiveLayout ⁠instead, will fix it

@Pujan92
Copy link
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Nov 22, 2024

@luacmartins I would like to confirm one last thing. I think whenever the search modal opens then only we need to focus first recent item.
Do we need to focus when a user types and clears the search input? Bcoz this scenario doesn't look right to me and leads to unwanted or more conditional code.

I have suggested a solution earlier without refocus but asking to clear it out.

@nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

PR and recordings updated

Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM and tests well

luacmartins
luacmartins previously approved these changes Nov 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Pujan92 Pujan92 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nyomanjyotisa Added cleanup comments as we don't require those changes.

const [isSearchingForReports] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.IS_SEARCHING_FOR_REPORTS, {initWithStoredValues: false});
const [autocompleteSuggestions, setAutocompleteSuggestions] = useState<AutocompleteItemData[] | undefined>([]);
const [autocompleteSubstitutions, setAutocompleteSubstitutions] = useState<SubstitutionMap>({});

const {isLargeScreenWidth} = useResponsiveLayout();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const {isLargeScreenWidth} = useResponsiveLayout();

Comment on lines 335 to 339
const setInitialFocus = useCallback(() => {
const initialFocusIndex = (sortedRecentSearches?.slice(0, 5).length ?? 0) + (contextualReportData ? 1 : 0);
listRef.current?.setFocusedIndex(initialFocusIndex);
}, [sortedRecentSearches, contextualReportData]);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const setInitialFocus = useCallback(() => {
const initialFocusIndex = (sortedRecentSearches?.slice(0, 5).length ?? 0) + (contextualReportData ? 1 : 0);
listRef.current?.setFocusedIndex(initialFocusIndex);
}, [sortedRecentSearches, contextualReportData]);

Comment on lines 355 to 358
} else if (!isLargeScreenWidth) {
listRef.current?.updateAndScrollToFocusedIndex(-1);
} else {
setInitialFocus();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
} else if (!isLargeScreenWidth) {
listRef.current?.updateAndScrollToFocusedIndex(-1);
} else {
setInitialFocus();
} else {
listRef.current?.updateAndScrollToFocusedIndex(-1);
}

Comment on lines 303 to 309
useEffect(() => {
if (textInputValue) {
return;
}
setIsInitialRender(true);
}, [textInputValue]);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
useEffect(() => {
if (textInputValue) {
return;
}
setIsInitialRender(true);
}, [textInputValue]);

@@ -716,12 +721,13 @@ function BaseSelectionList<TItem extends ListItem>(
isTextInputFocusedRef.current = isTextInputFocused;
}, []);

useImperativeHandle(ref, () => ({scrollAndHighlightItem, clearInputAfterSelect, updateAndScrollToFocusedIndex, updateExternalTextInputFocus, scrollToIndex}), [
useImperativeHandle(ref, () => ({scrollAndHighlightItem, clearInputAfterSelect, updateAndScrollToFocusedIndex, updateExternalTextInputFocus, scrollToIndex, setFocusedIndex}), [
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
useImperativeHandle(ref, () => ({scrollAndHighlightItem, clearInputAfterSelect, updateAndScrollToFocusedIndex, updateExternalTextInputFocus, scrollToIndex, setFocusedIndex}), [
useImperativeHandle(ref, () => ({scrollAndHighlightItem, clearInputAfterSelect, updateAndScrollToFocusedIndex, updateExternalTextInputFocus, scrollToIndex}), [

@Pujan92
Copy link
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Nov 27, 2024

@nyomanjyotisa Plz resolves the conflicts.

I think we don't require below test steps.

  1. Clear the search query
  2. Verify that the top-most result in Recent chats is not highlighted

@Pujan92
Copy link
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Nov 27, 2024

All looks good, once you merge main and fix conflicts I will approve.

@luacmartins luacmartins self-requested a review November 27, 2024 16:46
luacmartins
luacmartins previously approved these changes Nov 27, 2024
@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

We just need to resolve conflicts @nyomanjyotisa

@nyomanjyotisa
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry for the delay, the conflicts resolved.
I moved the initiallyFocusedOptionKey to SearchRouter and passed it from SearchRouterList as a prop since the styledRecentReports is moved from SearchRouterList to SearchRouter on the latest main.
Could you check this again? @Pujan92

Copy link
Contributor

@Pujan92 Pujan92 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, Thanks @nyomanjyotisa and @luacmartins !!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from luacmartins November 28, 2024 12:18
@@ -310,6 +311,10 @@ function SearchRouter({onRouterClose, shouldHideInputCaret}: SearchRouterProps)

const modalWidth = shouldUseNarrowLayout ? styles.w100 : {width: variables.searchRouterPopoverWidth};

const isDataLoaded = useMemo(() => {
return (!contextualReportID || contextualReportID !== undefined) && !isLoadingOnyxValue(recentSearchesMetadata) && recentReports.length > 0;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB: I think we don't need contextualReportID condition here bcoz currently also that condition truthy for any value.

Suggested change
return (!contextualReportID || contextualReportID !== undefined) && !isLoadingOnyxValue(recentSearchesMetadata) && recentReports.length > 0;
return !isLoadingOnyxValue(recentSearchesMetadata) && recentReports.length > 0;

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this a NAB? We should never merge code like this @Pujan92 😒

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It shouldn't be NAB, my bad 😢

@luacmartins luacmartins merged commit c70b6c1 into Expensify:main Nov 28, 2024
19 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.0.69-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 false ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 success ✅

@mvtglobally
Copy link

failing with original issue on MWeb

Screen_Recording_20241130_184606_Chrome.mp4

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Dec 2, 2024

@nyomanjyotisa @Pujan92 can you have a look into this?

@Pujan92
Copy link
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Dec 2, 2024

@mvtglobally these changes are specifically for larger screens as mentioned in the test steps and not for the native/mWeb.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 9.0.69-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 skipped 🚫
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 failure ❌
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 failure ❌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants